Conclusions

Assuming that all golfers want more forgiveness, accuracy and distance from their driver, what did we achieve in this test? By taking into account the setup of each driver, it becomes quite clear that there is more of a divide between the clubs than looks alone.

There are confidence benefits to be gained from the larger clubface drivers common to those in our high handicap category. But these clubs are influencing the players swing through the use of an upright lie angle and a closed clubface in an attempt to remove the sliced shot.

Whilst this methodology works, this setup can only be recommended to golfers who play infrequently and are disinterested in improving their game. Put these drivers into the hands of a better player, and the result is unwanted reactions as the golfer adapts to the club, and the positions which it forces them into.

What we find in the drivers selected for the mid handicap category is a more neutral setup. Callaway in particular have made a commendable decision to flatten the lie angle. Whilst it is disappointing that the major manufacturers are not yet offering the opportunity to change the lie angle, this flatter setup allows golfers to maintain good positions at impact, vital for long term player improvement. Meanwhile the low handicap category choices use their technology in slightly different ways, perhaps sacrificing some forgiveness in favour of maximum feel and giving the player ultimate control over their shots.

Distance wise it was felt that the differences between all of the drivers tested was minimal, though the results from a mishit was better from the more forgiving clubs. Ultimately, to get the best out of any of the drivers featured it is essential to be fitted, and this combined with a good strike is where real distance can be gained.